Posts Tagged ‘Stephen Fry’

Fry, Hitchens and the ‘Big Ten’

Friday, March 5th, 2010

Hitchens and Fry vs. Ann Widdecombe on the Ten Commandments
(video: Atheist Media Blog at YouTube)

In 1993, crazed conservative, faith-biased anti-gay and Member of the British Parliament, Ann Widdicombe left the Church of England over its decision to ordain women as priests. She became a Roman Catholic. The Conservative MP for Maidstone and the Weald and a former Shadow Home Secretary, Widdicombe along with Nigerian Archbishop John Onaiyekan, last November, debated a pair of well-known atheists, Christopher Hitchens and Stephen Fry, on British television. The question: Is the Roman Catholic Church a force for good in the world?

I watched and blogged about the debate back then. Widdicombe’s side and, by extension, the Vatican were utterly destroyed, whipped and sent packing by the non-believers. Proof? The video is re-posted below.

Apparently one sound thrashing was not enough for Ms Widdicombe that day. Following the debate, she confronted Hitchens and Fry for a recently-aired BBC special on the Ten Commandments. The incident and well-deserved contempt with which she was pummeled are nothing less than hilarious, as the video above attests.

The Intelligence Squared Debate (video: BBC, via iqsquared)

+++++++

As a super-duper extra-special bonus here’s Christopher Hitchens having another go at the Ten Commandments.

Christopher Hitchens: The New Commandments
(video: Atheist Media Blog at YouTube)

Read more here at Hitchen’s Vanity Fair article. Thou shalt enjoy. Trust me.

Stephen Fry: ‘Battle lines must be drawn’

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

From Big Think, Stephen Fry (video: Big Think)

From comedian, author and non-believer Stephen Fry:

You know if we empower ourselves with responsibility over our actions, responsibility over our destinies and responsibility for directing and maintaining and creating our own ethical and moral frameworks, which is the most important thing really isn’t it because perhaps the greatest insult to humanism is this idea that mankind needs a god in order to have a moral framework.

[ ... ]

I have no quarrel with individuals who wish… who are devout and who have faith. I don’t want to mock them. I really don’t, but damned if I’m going to be told by them what to do with my body or damned if I’m going to have the extraordinary battles won by enlightenment over the past 400 years, to have those battles abdicated by a new dark ages. It’s you know. The battle lines must be drawn.

(via: RichardDawkins.net)

A force for good? Hardly

Monday, November 9th, 2009

The Intelligence Squared Debate (video: BBC, via iqsquared)

This multi-section video program from the BBC posits the question: Is the Catholic Church a force for good in the world? That would be the same Catholic Church that opposes the use of condoms to fight AIDS, opposed civil marriages for LGBT Mainers and Californians, and is currently opposing healthcare reform in the United States.

Program description:

Aired 11-7-09 on BBC World Is the Catholic church a force for good in the world? “It stands up for the oppressed and offers spiritual succour to billions say the Church’s supporters. But what about the Church’s teachings on condoms, gays and women priests, ask the detractors.” Speaking for the motion, Archbishop John Onaiyekan and Anne Widdencombe MP. Speaking against the motion, Christopher Hitchens and Stephen Fry.

Click for all video segments.

Dearest absurd child

Friday, May 1st, 2009

stephen_fry_400

Stephen Fry (photo: Steve Forrest/Rex Features)

My friend Andy Harley, at UK Gay News, points to this must-read (there I go again!) essay by noted British humorist, author, actor, director, television presenter, non-believer, openly gay man and revered polymath Stephen Fry:

Stephen Fry’s letter to himself:
Dearest absurd child

Just who was the young, arrogant and confused man to whom Stephen Fry recently felt compelled to write a long and heartfelt letter? Himself, 35 years ago

I hope you are well. I know you are not. As it happens you wrote in 1973 a letter to your future self and it is high time that your future self had the decency to write back. You declared in that letter (reproduced in your 1997 autobiography Moab Is My Washpot) that “everything I feel now as an adolescent is true”. You went on to affirm that if ever you dared in later life to repudiate, deny or mock your 16-year-old self it would be a lie, a traducing, treasonable lie, a crime against adolescence. “This is who I am,” you wrote. “Each day that passes I grow away from my true self. Every inch I take towards adulthood is a betrayal.”

[ ... ]

I finally know now, as I easily knew then, that the most important thing is love. It doesn’t matter in the slightest whether that love is for someone of your own sex or not. Gay issues are important and I shall come to them in a moment, but they shrivel like a salted snail when compared to the towering question of love. Gay people sometimes believe (to this very day, would you credit it, young Stephen?) that the preponderance of obstacles and terrors they encounter in their lives and relationships is intimately connected with the fact of their being gay. As it happens at least 90% of their problems are to do with love and love alone: the lack of it, the denial of it, the inequality of it, the missed reciprocity in it, the horrors and heartaches of it. Love cold, love hot, love fresh, love stale, love scorned, love missed, love denied, love betrayed … the great joke of sexuality is that these problems bedevil straight people just as much as gay. The 10% of extra suffering and complexity that uniquely confronts the gay person is certainly not incidental or trifling, but it must be understood that love comes first. This is tough for straight people to work out.

Fry wisely cautions his 16-year-old self, “But be wary, for the most basic tenets of rationalism, openness and freedom that nourish you now and seem so unassailable are about to be harried and besieged by malevolent, mad and medieval minds.”

The limerick is under attack!

Sunday, December 7th, 2008

In the glossary of his lovely, lovely book, The Ode Less Traveled: Unlocking the Poet Within, the equally lovely Stephen Fry defines the limerick thusly:

Limerick: You know perfectly well.

Apparently certain people don’t know perfectly well. Here are three limericks in response.

Save the limerick!

In LaBarbera’s attempts at verse,
To damn those whom he labels perverse,
Peter picked up his pen
To bash queers once again —
His leavings couldn’t be any worse.

 

La Babs has his knickers in a twist.
To elucidate: Pete seems quite pissed.
With their infantile rhymes,
His poetics are crimes,
‘Cause the gist of the limerick’s been missed.

 

Having penned a few odes, I submit:
Peter’s poems are far from legit.
Some advice, dear Peter,
What’s missing is meter,
And the lack of wit makes your verse shit.

 

UPDATE: (12-07, 05:15 pm) Oh lookie! La Babs has learned to use ad hominem in a sentence, and he’s tried his hand at another anti-queer limerick, and he’s taken another pathetic shot at my buddy Jeremy Hooper of Good As You.

It must be because LaBarbera, who clearly lacks Jeremy’s gift for versification, is sort of stuck in that conservative Mean People Who Don’t Suck rut.