The holy sh*t has really hit the fan

March 17th, 2010, by Mike Tidmus

Jon Stewart: Holy Sh*t (video: The Daily Show with Jon Stewart)

It’s officially official: It’s no longer humanly possible to keep up with the relentless firestorm of reports about the Roman Catholic Church’s pedophile priest pandemic. And it not just journalists and bloggers having a difficult time. Vatican officials say they’re worried about being inadequately equipped to handle the massive and growing onslaught of accusations of decades of child molestations and sexual abuse by priests and the subsequent cover-ups by church authorities.

At The New York Times, Rachel Donadio writes:

ROME — As hundreds of new allegations of sexual abuse surface in the German church alone, a top Vatican official acknowledged Tuesday that, with only 10 people handling such cases, his office might not be adequate for the task.

But the official, Msgr. Charles J. Scicluna, who is effectively the Vatican’s internal prosecutor, said the church was working to bring more “transparency” to the delicate and emotional process of settling allegations of abuse by priests that have severely damaged the church’s moral standing.

“We have to get our act together and start working for more transparency in investigations and more adequate responses for the problem,” Monsignor Scicluna said, adding that this should happen “on every level of the church.”

Just FYI you Vatican officials: Your “moral authority” is history.

At the United Nations yesterday, Britain’s National Secular Society went on the offensive:

The Pope and the Vatican’s record on child abuse have been challenged today at the United Nations. Both were criticised with unprecedented candour at the UN Human Rights Council by Keith Porteous Wood, Executive Director of the National Secular Society.

Keith Porteous Wood, who made the intervention in Geneva on behalf of the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU), said: “Billions of dollars – and euros – have already been paid out in respect of thousands of victims in the USA and Ireland. News of further abuse has since appeared in Austria, the Netherlands and now Germany – and this is just the tip of the iceberg. How much more evidence of children’s suffering at the hands of the Church will the UN and the international community tolerate before fulfilling their responsibility to those children to hold the Vatican to account?

“The Vatican is a signatory to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), but has contravened several of its articles, and is more than 10 years behind in its reporting. It has habitually compounded the abuse and facilitated multiple reoffending by moving offenders around and shielding them from prosecuting authorities by imposing the “pontifical secret”. Major investigations in the USA and Ireland have been deliberately and cynically obstructed by the Church at all levels without censure from above. This includes the Vatican’s representative in Ireland, suggesting that he acted under instruction from the highest level in the Church. All this has led to abusers being allowed to continue offending and to escape justice, while their victims despair – some even committing suicide.

“The Church cannot claim it is being victimised. It still places the protection of its reputation, and even more its assets, above the protection of those entrusted to its care. Over 90% of the compensation payments paid by cash-strapped Ireland came from the tax payers, including the abused themselves.

Wood singled out then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who now serves as Pope, for criticism in regard to a report that is 13 years overdue, “Following an instruction from Cardinal Ratzinger when head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith [formerly The Inquisition], all suspicions and accusations of child abuse were to be sent to the Vatican in secret.”

And in the Western Hemisphere, video of an 82-year-old priest having sex with an altar boy was broadcast on Brazilian television. Writing for the Associated Press, Bradley Brooks reports:

RIO DE JANEIRO — Brazilian authorities are investigating three priests accused of sexually abusing altar boys after a video allegedly showing one case of abuse was broadcast on television, police and church officials said Tuesday.

The case came to light after the SBT network aired a video purportedly showing an 82-year-old priest having sex with a 19-year-old altar boy who worked for him for four years. Other young men appeared on the report saying that they, too, had been abused by Monsignor Luiz Marques Barbosa.

Also under investigation are Monsignor Raimundo Gomes, 52, and Father Edilson Duarte, 43, for allegedly having sexual relations with boys and young men.

[ ... ]

A Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said officials there were aware of the case.

Needless to say, there’s much more at the link.

Sans Comment

March 17th, 2010, by Mike Tidmus

Not The Amazing Race, it’s National Geographic’s Sizing Up Sperm
(video: National Geographic)

Stalling for the lord

March 17th, 2010, by Mike Tidmus

It’s pretty clear that the christianist right wouldn’t know (or tell) the truth if it bit them on their holier-than-thou asses. While Lying for the lord is as traditionally Mormon as having a rumpus room full of backup wives, who would have imagined the Mormon’s new found allies among the extremist religious reich and the Ratzi Crime Family would so quickly adopt and master the art.

Now, vis-à-vis the Perry v Schwarzenegger Prop 8 trial, we learn the latest tactic from the lying liars for the lord is stalling for the lord. While nobody’s certain what the long-range objective is, my guess is they’re buying time to set up a case for a mistrial based on witness intimidation, because several of their star homo-hating witnesses like San Diego pastors Jim Garlow and Miles McPherson showed their true color (spine-free yellow) when they attempted to worm out of testifying (find PDFs of their court filings at the links).

Now we learn, via the Associated Press’ Lisa Leff, that the decision in the trial on the constitutionality of Prop 8 will likely be delayed thanks to the theocrat’s latest legal maneuvering:

Evidence skirmish could delay end of Prop 8 trial

SAN FRANCISCO — An attempt by civil rights groups to keep sponsors of California’s same-sex marriage ban from obtaining internal campaign documents could delay a verdict in the federal trial on the constitutionality of Proposition 8, lawyers on both sides said Tuesday.

Attorneys warned of the possible bottleneck during a hearing where a federal judge was asked to overrule a magistrate who ordered organizations that fought the 2008 ban to turn over memos and e-mails to lawyers defending the voter-approved measure.

[ ... ]

Three groups that opposed Proposition 8 are challenging U.S. Magistrate Joseph Spero’s order earlier this month requiring them to hand over all documents “that contain, refer or relate to arguments for or against Proposition 8,” with the exception of private communications between their core leaders.

The hypocrisy of the radical religious reich will never cease to amaze. When the shoe was on the other foot and those who toiled — and spent huge amounts of Mormon money — to eliminate the existing right of California gay and lesbian couples to marry were asked to produce their internal documents, they bristled and labeled the order a “fishing expedition.”

Brian Brown of the National Organization for Opposite Marriage, in a missive dated 12 February 2010, wrote:

The San Francisco Chronicle broke the news that Judge Vaughn Walker is gay. I don’t know if it’s true or not, but here’s the really big indisputable fact the mainstream media should be focusing on: Judge Walker has been incredibly biased in his rulings from start to finish.

He ordered an expensive trial over the objections of Protect Marriage, in a case where frankly the issues are primarily matters of law. He further ruled that the private and personal feelings and attitudes of Protect Marriage folks and their campaign consultants–things by definition never communicated to voters–were properly subjected to subpoena power. This was a fishing expedition of a major order: Judge Walker tried to give gay-marriage advocates access to more than a million emails by ordinary Californians who worked on the campaign, and also to internal campaign strategy memos. (The Ninth Circuit rapped his knuckles on that one.) He refused to play fair by ordering opponents of Prop 8 to open up their strategy, too. Worst of all, he broke all the rules to try to get this case televised, over the objections of Protect Marriage (who are the defendants in this case).

(emphasis: mine)

And what exactly are the anti-gays fishing for? Well, kids, it ain’t exactly plastic Jesus fish:

A federal appeals court eventually ruled that exchanges among top campaign officials about strategy and messaging could be withheld, but information disseminated more broadly was fair game in the trial.

Jesse Panuccio, a lawyer for Proposition 8 supporters, told Walker that it was only reasonable to require opponents of the ban to abide by the same disclosure requirements as supporters.

Plaintiffs have tried to prove that outlawing same-sex marriage serves no legitimate purpose, and the defense wants to see if their private conversations showed they thought otherwise during the campaign, Panuccio said.

Of course, at this point, asking the No-on-8 side (the good guys) to produce their internal documents serves no useful purpose other than to delay the inevitable. It’s a ploy, a strategy, a time-wasting tactic. It’s nothing more than a Hail Mary that consists of stalling for the lord while the theocons attempt to come up with some other strategy to deny gay and lesbian Americans the full rights of citizenship.

Humanist association files SCOTUS brief

March 17th, 2010, by Mike Tidmus

Here’s a follow-up to my post from yesterday about the case currently before the US Supreme Court that began as a 2004 lawsuit brought by a Christians-only campus club against the University of California Hastings College of the Law. The Christian Legal Society was denied official recognition and funding due to its bigoted, discriminatory policies that excluded LGBT and non-Christian students.

The American Humanist Association has filed an amicus brief. From the group’s media release this morning:

The American Humanist Association files Amicus Brief in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez

(Washington, DC, March 17, 2010) The Appignani Humanist Legal Center, legal arm of the American Humanist Association, filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the Supreme Court Monday, arguing that the Court should affirm a decision made by a federal appeals court that the University of California Hastings College of the Law acted appropriately when the they denied recognition to a Christian-only student group.

The brief can be found [at this link].

The lawsuit was launched in 2004 by a chapter of the Christian Legal Society (CLS), a group that was barred from receiving school funds, priority access to facilities and use of Hastings’ logo because they did not permit non-orthodox Christians and gays to become voting members or leaders. Hastings had denied a request from the group that they be exempt from the school’s nondiscrimination policy, which prohibited student groups from discriminating on the basis of “race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, disability, age, sex or sexual orientation” as a condition for receiving access to school resources. The District Court ruled that Hastings’ policy was permissible and did not constitute a violation of the groups’ free speech rights, contrary to CLS’s argument. The 9th Circuit Court affirmed the policy was permissible because it was viewpoint neutral and reasonable.

“A University has every right to prohibit discrimination on the basis of religion or sexual orientation among student groups that receive school resources,” said Bob Ritter, AHLC attorney and counsel of record for the brief. “Public schools have an interest in making sure all students feel welcome, whether they are religious, non-religious, straight or gay. And ensuring that their resources don’t go to groups that violate policies of nondiscrimination is an appropriate measure to keep universities inclusive.”

“To be clear, this case is not about the school limiting student groups’ free speech rights,” Ritter added. “Groups that wish to discriminate in their membership are free to do so as privately operated entities, but they are not entitled to school sanction of their discriminatory policies.”

The AHLC’s brief argues that Hastings and other publicly-run institutions or entities can establish a conditional limited public forum for free speech, as long as the conditions for using the forum are neutral and generally applied. “A university can require student groups to abide by certain policies as long as those policies are applied universally, without bias or favor,” Ritter clarified.

The Appignani Humanist Legal Center filed the friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of the American Humanist Association, The American Ethical Union, Atheist Alliance International, Freedom From Religion Foundation, Institute for Humanist Studies, Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers and Secular Student Alliance.

The American Humanist Association advocates for the rights and viewpoints of humanists. Founded in 1941 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., its work is extended through more than 100 local chapters and affiliates across America.

Humanism is a progressive philosophy of life that, without theism, affirms our responsibility to lead ethical lives of value to self and humanity.

(link: added by me)

Earlier posts on christianist campus clubs suing
for the right to discriminate
:

More on Texas’ textbook buffoonery

March 17th, 2010, by Mike Tidmus

On 13 March, I blogged about the re-writing of American history by religious hacks. Wayne Besen, the Executive Director and founder of Truth Wins Out, in his weekly column has nailed the Christian supremacists who, after deviously taking control of Texas’ State Board of Education, took it upon themselves to re-write American history to suit their personal theocratic ambitions.

Writes Besen:

Last week, the Texas Board of Education voted 10-5, along party lines, to replace history textbooks with right wing political propaganda. The vote followed a separate, contentious scrum over whether creationism should be taught in science courses.

Here’s just about everything you need to know about the radical religious reich’s never-ending crusade to equate the Book of Genesis with actual science.

Just how extreme is the Board’s historical revisionism?

For example, Ronald Reagan, Richard Nixon, the Eagle Forum’s Phyllis Schlafly and the National Rifle Association have replaced Thomas Jefferson. This is in a despicable effort to marginalize the man who coined the phrase, “separation of church and state”, while elevating America as a right wing “Christian Nation.” (Thomas Edison and Albert Einstein were also eliminated to make room for these conservatives)

Newt Gingrich’s flash-in-the-pan Contract with America and Rev. Jerry Falwell’s short-lived Moral Majority are elevated as historically important, while the supposed religious roots of the American Revolution will be now be studied.

The christianists bleat on and on about their myth a so-called “Christian nation” and the wisdom of oour founding fathers, but as Besen notes:

It seems to me that our founders were quite eloquent and certainly able to convey their desire to be a fundamentalist nation, if that is what they had intended. But, our country is not called “God Land.” Jesus’ name is not in the United States Constitution.

Case closed.

These simple facts are clearly eating up these zealots inside and driving them to distraction. They just do not want to accept that their totalitarian and exclusionary vision of America is a radical and dangerous departure from the ideas of religious freedom embraced by our Founding Fathers.

Amen. Now read the rest at Truth Wins Out.